Alderman Burke has a slew of important people writing letters to the judge claiming Burke is a benevolent Chicago citizen who deserves a light sentence. Among the letter writers are former U.S. Attorney Dan Webb and former Chicago police superintendent Garry McCarthy.
Alderman Burke was supposed to get indicted decades ago but powerful forces prevented this from happening.
Alderman Burke came to power in 1983 as Chairman of the Finance Committee because the Chicago Mob wanted him there. There's really no other way to put it: for a part of his career he associated with a known made member of the Chicago Mob. He took orders from Alderman Fred Roti outside City Council chambers as Counselors Row restaurant at the "First Ward Table". In 1991, the Attorney General of the United States indentified Roti a made member of the Chicago Mob (page 15) of his annual report. Roti, was also identified as a made member of the Chicago Mob by the Justice Department in August of 1999 after he became a convicted felon. Did any this bother Alderman Burke? Not in the slightest . When Roti died , Burke introduced a resolution in Chicago's City Council in September of 1999 honoring the life of Fred Roti.
FBI informant Robert Cooley , in his book , When Corruption Was King accused Burke of trying to fix a murder trial for the Chicago Mob. Why didn't Burke sue Cooley for putting that in print? Burke has never denied it . When a Mob linked Chicago police officer murdered an African-American male : Burke is quoted saying "it's only a fucking nigger". Burke never sued Cooley for publishing this in his book.
Judge Kendall will have to consider how Alderman Burke turned Chicago's politcal system into a racketeering enterprise for his personal financial benefit. When he was indicted, Ed Burke's wife Anne was Chief Justice of the Illinois Supreme Court. Doesn't Chicago's biggest criminal deserve a rather long sentence considering what he was convicted of and what he was ever indicted on?