In a 5-2 decision, the IL Sup. Ct. has ruled that disseminating private sexual images without permission, also known as revenge porn, is not constitutionally protected free speech.

My 1st law challenged in the IL Sup. Ct. was upheld last week.

In a 5-2 decision, the IL Sup. Ct. has ruled that disseminating private sexual images without permission, also known as revenge porn, is not constitutionally protected free speech. https://t.co/eAwjnOKAWF

— Michael E. Hastings (@HastingsforIL) October 21, 2019