This is how it works all too often. Agenda-driven researchers produce a spurious report. Then credulous reporters take it seriously. In this case, the ⁦New York Times reporter didn’t even bother to seek out a single critic.

This is how it works all too often. Agenda-driven researchers produce a spurious report. Then credulous reporters take it seriously. In this case, the ⁦@nytimes⁩ reporter didn’t even bother to seek out a single critic. https://t.co/UtYFPZuEB3

— Christina Sommers (@CHSommers) January 11, 2019