Democrats will always get some significant segment of the women’s vote. But it won’t be because they’re women.Imagine that.
When women were genuinely oppressed — before they could vote, before they could own property, before they could have the same access to education or the same opportunities in the workplace — it might have been possible to appeal to them as a bloc, even as a movement.
But in an era when women get a greater percentage of the college degrees and women without children earn more than their male counterparts, most women don’t see themselves as victims, let alone ones who need to join hands in solidarity.
In Slate, Michelle Goldberg writes that Hillary’s “victory would have been a sign that the gender hierarchy that has always been fundamental to our society . . . was starting to crumble. It would have meant that men no longer rule.” She laments, “I thought my daughter was not going to be consigned to a lesser life than my son. I no longer do.”
Oh, please. If anyone besides a few liberal elites believed that, Hillary would have won.
Tuesday, November 15, 2016
The New York Post reports:
Posted by Steve Bartin at 8:41 AM