A 67-year-old anti-trust law in Pennsylvania is preventing Wal-Mart from selling $4 generic drugs. Instead, over four dozen different drugs have to be sold for at least $9.The government is the enemy of lower prices and competition.What better proof than this?
So...if you're a liberal, what side of the argument do you support? Do you defend Wal-Mart (God forbid) and repeal the law so that people can get their much-needed drugs at "an everyday" low price?
Or do you side with the mom-and-pop pharmacies that supposedly can't compete against the big, bad Wal-Mart?
Tuesday, April 29, 2008
67 Year Old Pennsylvania Law Prevents Wal-Mart From Selling $4 Drugs
Club For Growth reports: