The most troublesome assumption, however, is that the state could purchase insurance coverage from private insurers for $250 per person per month – scarcely half of what the largest purchaser of private insurance in the state, the California Public Employees' Retirement System, now pays. Were it to climb to just $300, the legislative analyst determined, deficits would quickly climb into the multibillion-dollar range.California doesn't have money to fund it's new budget but it wants to expand health care.Imagine that.
Strangely, another very important issue arose only in the final minutes of the hearing – the strong possibility that imposing health care mandates on employers would be illegal under federal law – and was quickly dismissed. The prevailing attitude appears to be to enact something and hope that it can pass legal muster, a rather irresponsible approach.
Sunday, January 27, 2008
Does California Care If It's New Socialist Health Plan Is Legal?
The Sacramento Bee reports: