At his confirmation hearings, Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. expressed his commitment to "judicial modesty" and his respect for precedent. It would not be judicially modest to tear a gaping hole in Congress's landmark campaign-finance statute, and it would not show respect for precedent to undo a key part of the landmark 2003 case that upheld the law's reasonable restrictions on money in politics.Even Plessy had to get tossed at sometime.Maybe,not everyone thinks that the New York Times is more special 60 days before an election.
Wednesday, January 25, 2006
The New York Times Defends Its' Monopoly
The New York Times in a editorial is rather upset that the Roberts court make not be too friendly to McCain-Feingold: