So on Friday, I asked Fitzgerald about the line about the "influential alderman," and when Laski, who previously had several political spats with Daley, could have been brought back inside the fold where a deal could be made on trucks he sponsored.Shouldn't racketeering statues apply to real criminals?
"We make no allegations in the complaint about the timing of this ..." Fitzgerald told me.
No, I said, I'm making the allegation, and I'm asking you to help me.
"I'm not going to help you," Fitzgerald said.
I asked if federal prosecutors could use the racketeering statutes to go back in time, to override the statute of limitations on old scams.
"There's a single reference to a conversation Mr. Laski said he had [with the influential alderman]" Fitzgerald said. "We're not going to comment on the significance of it beyond what's in the complaint. We don't generally do that, and I can't."
Sunday, January 15, 2006
Is the City of Chicago A Racketeering Enterprise?
John Kass of the Chicago Tribune asks none other than Patrick Fitzgerald about Chicago City Clerk James Laski: