The New York Times has high praise for
Comrade Barbara Enrenreich of the Democratic Socialists of America.Enrenreich's new book gets a timely review and starts with this opening sentence:
Nobody reads Barbara Ehrenreich without developing a heightened sense of how American business operates.
and this laughable praise:
But she is once again a smart, mordant observer of the world that her book describes. "In networking, as in prostitution, there is no time for fascination" is one of her observations here. "Nickel and Dimed" was similarly gimlet-eyed, but its targets were more tangible, given the indignation of a struggling underclass. This time, the very elusiveness of any certainty - even as to what actually constitutes having a job anymore - makes it harder for her to take aim.
The Times doesn't want you to know Comrade Ehrenreich is a leader of an organization that wants to destroy private property,so no mention of the leadership role in the Democratic Socialists of America.Is this the best example today, of the liberal MSM?
