Newsalert: The models assumed full “social distancing,” so you can’t claim that “social distancing” is the reason the numbers are lower than the predictions. The actual reason they’re lower is simple and obvious: the models were complete garbage from the beginning.

Monday, April 06, 2020

The models assumed full “social distancing,” so you can’t claim that “social distancing” is the reason the numbers are lower than the predictions. The actual reason they’re lower is simple and obvious: the models were complete garbage from the beginning.

The models assumed full “social distancing,” so you can’t claim that “social distancing” is the reason the numbers are lower than the predictions. The actual reason they’re lower is simple and obvious: the models were complete garbage from the beginning. https://t.co/EEACvcL2H7
— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) April 6, 2020