SSRN has the blockbuster journal article from Phillip W. Magness and Sean J Hernandez :
Scholars of John Maynard Keynes' life and contributions to economics have tended to approach his involvement in the early 20th century eugenics movement by either:Here's an extract from the article...
(1) historicizing it as a regrettable political curiosity with only minor connections to his larger system of economic thought or,
(2) positing an evolutionary turn in Keynes' thinking that led him to abandon his earlier neo-Malthusian principles in the late 1920s.
In this paper, we reexamine the role that eugenicist beliefs played in the formation of Keynesian macroeconomic theory, particularly as it concerned the problem of unemployment. Turning to a historical analysis of Keynes' writings and accompanying archival material, we present evidence of a continuity of eugenicist themes that links his early work on population control to his embrace of state-organized economic design at the mature phase of his career. Taken in sum, eugenics adds a complicated moral dimension to the genesis of Keynesian thought, though one that we also note is highly consistent with the technocratic inclinations of progressive era policymaking.
Here's the great economist Ludwig Von Mises fighting back.
When progressives smear William Graham Sumner and Herbert Spencer as racist social darwinists you know why: because many progressives are the real racists. Please read then entire scholarly journal article. No word yet on whether Paul Krugman will disavow his Keynesianism. Also, word yet on when Social Justice Warriors will demand that Keynesian economics be purged from academia due to his racist legacy.
